<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Media Monkey &#187; Search engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/category/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 09:57:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Darn those pesky sites that hide their content!</title>
		<link>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2012/01/darn-those-pesky-sites-that-hide-their-content/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2012/01/darn-those-pesky-sites-that-hide-their-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>monkey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendly web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/?p=1028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#8217;t hide forever. You song lyric sites that fund your free service with myriad ads for babes and buttock enhancers. You pesky download sites (freeware software only I assure you) who send me via 18,459 dodgy looking links just to get the latest version  &#8230; <a href="http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2012/01/darn-those-pesky-sites-that-hide-their-content/" class="more-link">Read More <span class="excerpt-arrow">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t hide forever. You song lyric sites that fund your free service with myriad ads for babes and buttock enhancers. You pesky download sites (freeware software only I assure you) who send me via 18,459 dodgy looking links just to get the latest version of Paint.net.</p>
<p>And dictionaries, currency exchanges and all you other useful free tools. You can now no more send me to the pit of your murky online lair somewhere miles below &#8216;the fold&#8217; before I find the answer to my questions (another one there, Q&amp;A sites, aha!).</p>
<p>Nope, no more. Now that Google has realised how many milliseconds you take away from me with your location based ads for girls in Leeds and belly tucks in Bradford. You will soon fall from your lofty perches unless you change your ways and make my life easier!</p>
<p><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/01/page-layout-algorithm-improvement.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/01/page-layout-algorithm-improvement.html?referer=');">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/01/page-layout-algorithm-improvement.html</a></p>
<p>It can only be a good thing (unless of course those ads are <em>for</em> Google?!)</p>
<p><a href="http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ads-versus-contenjt-new-google-page-layout-change.jpg" rel="lightbox[1028]" title="ads versus content, new google page layout change"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1030" title="ads versus content, new google page layout change" src="http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ads-versus-contenjt-new-google-page-layout-change-540x585.jpg" alt="ads versus content, new google page layout change" width="540" height="585" /></a></p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2012/01/darn-those-pesky-sites-that-hide-their-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Real Time SERPs: fad or flipping useful?</title>
		<link>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2009/12/google-real-time-serps-fad-or-flipping-useful/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2009/12/google-real-time-serps-fad-or-flipping-useful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>monkey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Google&#8217;s real time search results a PR stunt to win back traffic lost to Bing or a truly great new product development? My girlfriend rushed up to me last night as I was typing up my Bob Dylan post and burst into our spare  &#8230; <a href="http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2009/12/google-real-time-serps-fad-or-flipping-useful/" class="more-link">Read More <span class="excerpt-arrow">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Are Google&#8217;s real time search results a PR stunt to win back traffic lost to Bing or a truly great new product development?</strong></h2>
<p>My girlfriend rushed up to me last night as I was typing up my Bob Dylan post and burst into our spare room (which doubles as my writing/beer/photography studio and her teaching homework room) and starting ranting about a brilliant advert for the Sun.</p>
<p>Deep in concentration (and laughing at Dylan&#8217;s fake hair in the video to his new Christmas song &#8216;Must be Santa&#8217;) I nipped onto Google and typed in something I expected to find no results for: &#8216;sun advert&#8217;.</p>
<p>Right I was, nada.</p>
<p>Except then I noticed Google real time search ads and realised that these new fangled search results that were being used for nothing more than vanity exercises by egotistical tweeters or updates on Tiger Woods gossip, actually had a genuine use.</p>
<p>I was waiting seconds rather than minutes before through the fast incoming tweets praising the ad, a selfless tweeter posted a YouTube link straight to a copy of the advert (which you can see at the bottom of the page).</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="577" height="403" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="flashvars" value="video=ZIRmll7TBew" /><param name="src" value="http://embed.screenjelly.com/swf/SJPlayer.swf" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="577" height="403" src="http://embed.screenjelly.com/swf/SJPlayer.swf" flashvars="video=ZIRmll7TBew" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s real time results are a great PR exercise and prove to a certain extent that Google are the search engine pushing boundaries and making searching online more personal. I &#8216;ll bet they&#8217;ve bumped their market share of searches up hugely recently but the test of time will be if small incidents like mine become the type of useful experience that the online population begin to demand and use on a regular basis.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fVMnmTFxAjA&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fVMnmTFxAjA&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2009/12/google-real-time-serps-fad-or-flipping-useful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good or bad beer PPC?</title>
		<link>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2009/09/good-or-bad-beer-ppc/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2009/09/good-or-bad-beer-ppc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>monkey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landing page strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just stumbled across this PPC ad for Tesco (either bidding on niche beer merchant brand names or using broad match on &#8216;beer&#8217; I guess?). Nothing wrong with that, and in the light of me hearing that they would be starting to stock a few more  &#8230; <a href="http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2009/09/good-or-bad-beer-ppc/" class="more-link">Read More <span class="excerpt-arrow">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just stumbled across this PPC ad for Tesco (either bidding on niche beer merchant brand names or using broad match on &#8216;beer&#8217; I guess?).</p>
<div id="attachment_14" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 605px"><a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB305&amp;q=beer&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en_amp_rlz=1C1GGLS_en-GBGB291GB305_amp_q=beer_amp_btnG=Search_amp_meta=&amp;referer=');"><img class="size-large wp-image-14     " title="bad-beer-ppc-crop" src="http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bad-beer-ppc-crop-1024x625.jpg" alt="Tesco's PPC ads in Google's sponsored links" width="595" height="363" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tesco&#39;s PPC ads in Google&#39;s sponsored links</p></div>
<p>Nothing wrong with that, and in the light of me hearing that they would be starting to stock a few more North American beers I thought I&#8217;d take a look.</p>
<div id="attachment_15" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 646px"><a href="http://www.tesco.com/superstore/frames/default.asp?url=/superstore/frames/main.asp?url=/superstore/product/search.aspx?search=beer" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tesco.com/superstore/frames/default.asp?url=/superstore/frames/main.asp?url=/superstore/product/search.aspx?search=beer&amp;referer=');"><img class="size-large wp-image-15     " title="bad-beer-ppc-2-crop" src="http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bad-beer-ppc-2-crop-1024x636.jpg" alt="Tesco's landing page: good or bad PPC strategy?" width="636" height="396" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tesco&#39;s landing page: good or bad PPC strategy?</p></div>
<p>Alas, I need to sign in as an existing customer, or register.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not really interested in going through the red tape of registering just to see Tesco&#8217;s beer range, so off I go on my previous &#8216;online journey&#8217;. So in my case, Tesco&#8217;s PPC tactics have led to a potential lost sale.</p>
<p>But I did wonder whether this is actually a good tactic? If I&#8217;m only browsing, yes they&#8217;ve paid for my click, but they haven&#8217;t had to waste time analysing lots of wasted traffic from a &#8216;tyre kicker&#8217; like me, who wasn&#8217;t actually likely to buy.</p>
<p>Those that do register and browse are much more likely to buy, and their web stats should reflect the behaviour of people actually in the market to purchase. Plus, I wonder if this tactic actually has led to an increase in registered users?</p>
<p>By no means best practice, and not quite sure if this really fits Google&#8217;s landing page policy, but I maybe the amount Tesco spend on PPC probably Google&#8217;s concern over that&#8230;</p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalmediamonkey.co.uk/2009/09/good-or-bad-beer-ppc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

